After reading my students’ reflections on their blogging experience I felt like my assignment had taken multiple swigs of the Polyjuice Potion from Harry Potter. If two or more people swallow some Polyjuice potion they can all look like the same person, even though they are not.
The reason why I was feeling that way was the sharp divide in the reaction to how I set up the blogging assignment. See every blog was supposed to in some way tie back to what we had learned in class, even if the student wanted to write about something that wasn’t class related. So when I read the following in their reflections:
Student 1: “I loved the blogging assignment because of the freedom I had to write about anything I wanted to write about.”
Student 2: “I found it very difficult and limiting to be forced to write about things that I didn’t want to write about.
It made me do a double-take.
Of course it feels like a simple task, to me, to connect two things that seem so different that they can’t possibly be linked. I wrote about the power of this approach in my post on why we should replace close reading with connected reading and in my post on the power of FM writing.
a picture from one of the above blog posts
For example, what if I told a student that they had to include the idea of seven Harry Potters in a blog post but they weren’t interested in Harry Potter. Perhaps they are only interested in sports, other movies, food, or school. Well, it’s really quite possible to make those connections. Just look below.
But let’s say it’s not so simple, let’s say that the challenge of having to address specific content in your writing is a gosh darn constraint. And everyone knows that constraints KILL creativity right?
Creativity CRAVES constraint because a constraint is a connection and nothing can be created when there are no connections. Constraints FORCE connections, and connecting is a good thing- we crave it. Schema is how we organize our world from day one.
Those connections can be something as abstract as the constraint of time which, according to designer Damien Correll, can eliminate second guessing and connect your work to “gut instincts.”
Besides time, constraints can be tool based. Will Turnage, VP of Technology and Invention at digital advertising agency R/GA, starts many of their design and innovation projects with a tool-based constraint and firmly believes that constraints are essential to creativity. So let’s see this in action.
I teach English. In some of our lessons we talk about character development. We also talk about ethics. So how can I help my students explore both in a new and novel way? #whatIF I used a tool first approach? I’ll limit myself to tools found here:
I’m going to limit myself to just ONE app. I’m going to pick an app that I hear some of my Twitter peeps mock: ClassDojo
In a nutshell ClassDojo is a teacher app where you can assign “points” for positive and negative behaviors in your class and then assign each student in your class a particular visual monster. When a student does something well his monster gets positive points. Usually teachers have the class of monsters on a large digital projection screen so that the kids can see the points they are getting in real time and modify their behavior accordingly. My brother-in-law actually used it with a high school class in New Zealand and loved it. But that’s not how we are going to use it today. We are going to do character analysis and ethical analysis and discussion using ClassDojo.
So the first thing you are going to do is sign up for ClassDojo and then create an account. Mr. Dumbledore is teaching this class. It would be interesting if Snape or other famous Potter teachers were handing out points. Use a character list and populate the class.
As you read add “Positive” and “Needs Work” behavior items whenever a character does something of note. You can discuss how many points you would give each item. You could even read famous philosophers and use their essays on ethics to inform your decisions. Heck the philosopher could be the class teacher and you could run multiple Potter classes in groups. Each group assigns points based on the ethical beliefs of a famous philosopher and then compare the results.
How fun would it be to have the ClassDojo class up during an in class read and then see the points pop up and down while you read. You could even let different students or pairs of students control the point giving and then explain their choices after the reading.
This part is super interesting and has tons of possibilities. You could have students write or present an analysis of characters based on their overall “ethical wheel.” You could even have students do this with outside reading books as an option for a book report.
Do you notice this last image? It’s an ethical wheel of the whole “class.” Basically it’s an ethical analysis of every major character. What if you had an AP class use this method to compare and contrast the ethical makeup of various books you read throughout the year and then they analyzed which books they liked the most and whether the class likes books that are more ethical or unethical and why?
But wait! There’s more! Could you do this with other subjects? Of course:
- Imagine a whole ClassDojo class built of famous people from one side of World War I and the analysis that would come out of that?
- Imagine a math class trying to figure reverse engineer the final ethical wheel if you left out key stats. Or what if they came up with formulas to determine the value of common behaviors in their own life?
- Imagine a PE class watching video clips from various sporting events and determining the ethical wheel and values of what they see during games?
All of this imagining came out of being “constrained” to using ClassDojo as a learning tool instead of just a motivational tool. Imagine how many other possibilities exist in a place like the Google App Store For Education. Imagine giving your staff a choice of five programs and then having them brainstorm unconventional ways to use those programs in the classroom as a PD activity and then sharing those ways with their peers.
This is all very similar to what Jon Corippo and others calls an Iron Chef lesson plan. When you force everyone to use a certain element in their creation. For example what if every student had to use a picture of something eating as a slide in their presentation? You might get some pretty interesting takes. You could get animals eating, animation characters eating, bugs eating, a giant whirlpool, or just this.
You could even do a version of the TV show Chopped by giving your students or your Professional Development groups a “basket” of three ingredients they HAVE to use in their creation.
Or… imagine using the TV Show Cutthroat Kitchen as a Professional Development activity/challenge or in your classroom. Each group gets 100 points. They can keep them or spend them on buying extra time or tools or taking time or tools away from the other group of students or teachers. Imagine trying to create a Google Slide Deck but an opposing team has bought the right to take away your ability to use pictures, videos or GIFs. Or you can only use pictures of electrical outlets in your presentation. (that might be the best presentation I’ve ever seen in a school PD)
Please feel free to share your own creative constraints below. Thanks.